Thing 9 is focussing on social bookmarking and trying out using Diigo, a social bookmarking tool which allows you to bookmark, tag, highlight and add notes to web pages. I have a nasty habit of not bookmarking stuff and just using Google to find things again but this can often be frustrating and time wasting so I was keen to give Diigo a try.
As mentioned in my previous post about Evernote, I am currently working on a project to put in place systems and processes to ensure we can preserve our digital archives. As you might expect, much of the information and discussion on this happens online. There are lots of people out there and increasingly lots of guidance and case studies so keeping track of everything that is going on can be tricky. Having said that, I think Diigo could be a great way to bring all the resources into one place and organise them into something meaningful for my research. I particularly like the ability to tag things (I do like to tagging stuff – it’s almost like an archive classification scheme but much more flexible because things can have more than one tag) it means that I can have an overall tag of digital preservation and then have more specific tags too. I think this works a lot better than the alternative which would be to create folders within folders on my Internet Explorer favourites list.
I found Diigo very easy to set up and start tagging, I added a few of the websites I find particularly useful and a report I’d just discovered about the future of archives and tagged them. I then tried out the highlighting tool which seems like a really useful idea… until it actually came to doing the highlighting. I had selected a 12 line paragraph and was told it contained too many words to highlight. Too many words? I agree it would be wholly pointless to go about highlighting vast swaths of text but one paragraph? It seems ludicrously restrictive. After a quick bit of googling it seems that the limit is 50 words although as Diigo don’t seem to mention it in their help section I’m not sure if this is totally correct.
So, although I think I will still use Diigo for collating digital preservation info (and sharing with colleagues who are also working on it) the highlighting tool seems to be a bit of a damp squib.